Are physicians bad with money? This recent study helps answer the question using data collected from 422 medical residents and fellows at Washington University and the University of Arizona. The participating physicians completed a quiz on basic personal finance knowledge and answered additional questions on financial status, behaviors and professional advice. And the results aren’t pretty.
They scored a big fat F (52%) on the quiz section. Only 65.4% knew Roth IRA’s allowed for tax-free withdrawals in retirement, 19.9% knew bond prices fall when interest rates rise and 16.1% knew why different mutual fund share classes existed (to provide the same investment with a different expense structure).
Their feelings about financial status, behaviors and dealings with professional advisors are equally concerning. They gave themselves a score of 4.8 out of 10 in regards to their satisfaction with their personal finances. Only 14% of residents with children have a will. Of those surveyed, 46.7% or 197 residents and fellows obtained professional financial advice in past 5 years. However, the overwhelming majority didn’t actually pay anything for the professional financial advice (maybe they’re getting what they paid for). Insurance and investment advice topped the list of the type advice received. Coincidentally, most financial professionals, especially those that don’t charge fees, only get paid when they sell insurance and investment products.
Professional Financial Advice Is Not Working
It’s clear from the study that physicians in-training are failing financially. And I’m not surprised. After all, when you’re working 80+ hours per week learning medicine, everything else takes a back seat. Before we talk about solutions, let’s talk about what’s not working.
As the data suggests, plenty of financial professionals are actively providing free financial advice to help address the problem. But it’s not working because it turns out these financial professionals are really salespeople paid to sell insurance, not give advice. In fact, most financial advisors chasing residents are explicitly required per their employment contract NOT to give financial advice. Why would they call themselves “advisors”? Because anybody can call themselves a financial advisor and it’s easier to sell product as a “professional advisor”.
Financially inexperienced and illiterate physicians in training aren’t qualified to sniff out salespeople vs true advisors. It’s the perfect opportunity for aggressive salespeople to disguise themselves as advice providers offering free “education”. Every day, financial advisor-salespeople deliver financial lectures to residents and fellows across the country. They gladly offer attendees no-cost financial advice, planning and one-on-one meetings. In fact, they’re going to chase every single attendee until they agree to schedule a one-to-one meeting.
The real damage happens in these one-on-one meetings. Young physicians lacking experience and financial knowledge are at a serious disadvantage when they sit face to face with a highly trained salesperson disguised as a financial advisor. Many don’t understand the danger of conflicts of interest and naively assume people are looking out for their best interests. They need all kinds of financial advice: when to buy disability insurance, what type mortgage to get or how to manage student loans. Why not get it all from the free trusted advisor that’s offering to come to you? I know this process well because I used to be one of these advisors. Eventually, I realized how this was misleading, quit my sales job and started my business.
What’s The Solution?
Quality, unbiased financial education is the starting point. The author implies that it’s the medical educators’ and ACGME’s responsibility to improve financial wellness for in-training physicians. He suggests that medical educators should incorporate financial education into curricula. And that it be measured for effectiveness. All great ideas!
The question is: who is capable of providing the quality unbiased financial education to medical residents and fellows? It’s certainly not financial advisor-salespeople.
What about the educators themselves? This cuts out most of the conflicts of interest. Money is a tricky topic – especially when you consider the behavioral components. However, these medical educators have no experience with delivering financial education and coaching. Plus. it’s taking them away from their expertise of teaching medicine. I don’t see this as the ideal solution either.
For this to work, it must be provided by a third-party company with expertise and experience with delivering objective and actionable content to physicians in-training. Conflicts of interest must be avoided by using a company that’s strictly fee-for-service (no commissions or kickbacks) with concentration in financial wellness for physicians. These financial wellness programs should be incorporated into curricula and be paid for by the institution. Incentives similar to health wellness programs could be built in to drive participation. The program would include workshops, tools and other resources tailored to in-training physicians and delivered by the objective experts. The educational campaign should be measured along the way for effectiveness at improving financial literacy and desired outcomes.
Have questions or care to share your experience? Ask/share in the comments!
Are you interested in having a conversation? We’d love to connect! Click here to request a free consultation. We look forward to hearing from you.
Looking to create your own financial plan? Click here to download our free guide to getting started.
Wrenne Financial Planning LLC (“WFP”) is a registered investment adviser offering advisory services in the State of CO, IN, KY, TX, TN and in other jurisdictions where exempted. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The presence of this website on the Internet shall not be directly or indirectly interpreted as a solicitation of investment advisory services to persons of another jurisdiction unless otherwise permitted by statute. Follow-up or individualized responses to consumers in a particular state by WFP in the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable state exemption. All written content on this site is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of WFP, unless otherwise specifically cited. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources and no representations are made by our firm as to another parties’ informational accuracy or completeness. All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.